Notes: Distributed Activism Session

  • Andrew Stocking (care2.com)
    • What has been demonstrated as potentialy distributable
      • fund raising
        • move on
      • "traditional" activism
        • letter writing
      • Current projects
        • distributed datbases
          • updating of press database by Martin Kearns and Green
            Media Toolshed
    • What's the value of social networking to NPOs
      • increasing loyalty of members
        • those who belong to organizations along with friends are
          more likely to participate
      • viral growth potential
      • better personalization
        • target categories, demographics, etc
      • distribute work
        • customer support
          • craigslist, MoveOn
        • messaging
        • Group Leadership
        • community building
    • What does it take to make a campaign viral
      • campaign taps into intrinsic belief of audience
        • examples: chemical dumping, going to church, marriage
          ammendment
      • empowerment
        • promote sense of power over both personal and external world
        • MoveOn superbowl, visual indicators of campaign
          contributions online
      • Social Norm
        • create an atmosphere where people believe
          activism/participation is the norm
    • Structure of constituent groups
      • overlayed interconnected interpersonal, issue and
        institutionaly organized networks
    • Care2
      • membership
        • ~80% women,
        • avg age 35 (MoveOn 50/50 gener, avg age 45)
      • often skews positive relative to suspected state membership
        (% membership from state compared with % of national pop)
        • socially networked initiatives can be more efficient at
          penetrating hostile environments by networking friends
      • serves as a lauunch pad for disemination of messages even
        outside the care2 community
      • upcoming: karma
        • users rated baed on criteria such as how many of their
          messages are opened, how many are followed up, etc.
        • important for reducing inbox overload
      • attracts many who lack strong social networks
      • Green stars
        • initiative launched without any instruction, just enabled
          the ability to grant green stars to other
        • (stars expire)
        • has kept much of the community active
        • gives people a sense of participation in community
      • There are individuals online willing and excited about the
        ability to aide in many maintenance, etc. tasks
        • filtering of obsene content
    • How do networks affect NPOs
      • envolvement in social networks doubles participation
      • each post/new group membership results in a 2% increased
        likelihood to take action.
  • Justin Rueben (MoveOn)
    • MoveOn is in a sense a model of centralized system
      • distributed work which is centralized work
      • coordinated and conducted in unison
      • principle: "if we all do the same thing at the same time we
        can have a greater impact"
    • Left currently like the Empire Strikes Back
    • Election Story
      • Basic problem which move on sought to address in the election
        • maximize impact of 1 million members in swing states
      • goal: enable canvasing
        • gold standard of canvasing is peer to peer
        • how to motivate individuals to canvas in swing neighborhoods
        • most canvasing was centralized (phonebanks, etc) because of
          lack of infrastructure
        • only labor and parties have such infrastructure
      • plan: 500 organizers to contact 500,000 voters in 10,000
        precincts
      • developed web ap to manage canvasing
        • combine instructions with functionality to enable those
          with little political or tech experience to use database of local
          precinct targets
        • one could log on, select targets for canvasing and then
          "check them out" of the system so others would not be assigned to
          contact those individuals
        • q: potential to sabotage?
          • decentralized systems hard to sabotage, would take too
            much work
      • Challenge of recruitment
        • canvasing a much more chalenging volutneer position than
          others
          • individuals scared of talking politics with neighbors
          • time intensive
          • volunteers consistently inspired and surprised by finding
            submerged network of others with similar views
        • strategies
          • standard emails
          • community meetings (w/ roleplay)
          • paid staff publicity campaigns: phone drives, etc.
          • precinct partners: offload work to those outside
            locality, such as phone contacting those who door-to-door canvasers had
            been unable to contact
          • calling partied thrown together at last minute
            • 1.2 mil phone calls made in last day
          • emails important to provide narrative and sense of
            involvement in larger process
      • need to distribute support of technology
        • 800 number used to route calls to individuals who could log
          in to web system
        • coordinated by chat room staff superpvisors
        • even international volunteers became involved (enabled 24
          hour support)
        • heroic volunteers crucial to success
      • success
        • 500k MoveOn motivated voters counted at polls
        • 1.2 mil contacted
    • Q's:
      • advocacy
      • what is learned
        • community building was thought secondary but was actually
          crucial
          • operation democracy aimed to build on lessons
        • next time will start earlier
  • Lynn Benanders (cooperative life, CoOpLife.com)
    • federation of cooeratives and grassroots organizations working
      for progressive movements
      • aims to utilize food coops, CSAs, farming coops, etc. to
        effect policy initiatives
      • Tom Murray: use of training systems to enable ??
      • goals
        • to build sustainable economy in north east
        • encourage localy owned, group-based and democratic
          businesses
          • more apt to be "just" in terms of labor, environment and
            community values
          • group-capital important because capital is mobile, and
            the threat of relocation is mitigated by cooperative ownership
            • CoOps in NYC were often a product of labor initiatives
    • CoOps
      • over 10k coops in New England and New York
    • currentl tools
      • aimed primarily toward sharing opinions
      • initiation of new ideas inhibits productive meetings
      • technology tools well suited to allowing this process outside
        of meetings to form a basis for action
        • enable distributed decision making online
        • group consesus allows decisive, centralized action in the
          future
      • group ownership requires technology
        • in order for large organizations to remain responsive to
          their members
      • online support of public-policy meetings
        • provide resources for meetings in centralized repositories
        • based on communispace
      • online community services coupled with personal contact and
        support networking
      • lessons learned from attempts to organize Co-Op power using
        online tools
        • simply building resource not sufficient to garuntee
          involvement
        • needed agressive support initially
          • tech support
          • contact "lurkers" and invite participation (do not use
            the term "lurker" however, following onsite content important first
            step in involvement)
        • required 10 hour a day person to facilitate community
      • "meta-cognitive tools" to shape the nature of content which
        is posted
        • forced labeling of posts as such categories as "question"
          "agree/support" "disagree/concern", etc. causes people to rethink posts
        • limit brief posts
      • based on plone
    • sucesses
      • used to generate possible sites for wind turbines by
        publicizing criteria for sites
      • participation now exhibits high level of ownership and
        education due to available materials and concrete shared vision
      • alignment allows for bolder moves decided from bottom up than
        would be possible if proposed from top down
      • resulting decision process
        • maintains respect while processing diferences
        • allows creative conflict resolution
        • promotes transparancy and reflection
    • Dan Keshet main programmer
Submitted by ethanw on April 16, 2005 - 2:05pm.
( categories: )